Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2016-04-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2016-04-15 House Journal Page 2392 HB 200 Representative Talerico moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHB 200(HSS) am be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 200(HSS) am was before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 200(HSS) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2016-04-15 House Journal Page 2393 CSHB 200(HSS) am Third Reading Final Passage Reconsideration YEAS: 32 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 7 Yeas: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Olson, Ortiz, Reinbold, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez, Wool Excused: Hawker Absent: Edgmon, Gattis, Neuman, Pruitt, Saddler, Thompson, Wilson And so, CSHB 200(HSS) am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 200(HSS) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.